Latest news for blood pressure > coversyl 2mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $133.00 from fda approved pharmacy
The term "Single Sign-On", and/or it's typical acronym "SSO", is used all over the place -- for example in piles of specifications from various SDOs (Standards Developing/Development Organization) and other orgs (eg corporations, . edu world, government, etc). Does anyone -- including the authors of said specifications -- actually believe that a would ever have a single set of that they wield everywhere?!#%$^ I don't believe most folks actually believe that. However, this discussion is decidedly NOT over. I too had thought it was -- but then I was recently talking with another security protocol professional who was thinking that we, in the , were being presumptuous because we employed the "SSO" term, and he thought we were taking it literally, as in "single sign-on". Which of course we don't, and are not doing. Rather, what most everyone appears to acknowledge, including us in the SSTC is that people will end up with some [blood pressure > coversyl 2mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $133.00 from fda approved pharmacy] finite set of credentials, or personas, or identities (or whichever word you want to use according to the taxonomy/lexicon to which you subscribe), where the number of credentials is likely > 1 for any given person (but doesn't have to be of course, it is zero for a lot of people on the planet as yet (in terms of the Internet)). Note that this is the situation we're in today, however those of us "in the know" create a new set of creds (eg username & password) for most every Internet site with which we establish a relationship. However blood pressure > coversyl 2mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $133.00 from fda approved pharmacy, the hope of those of us behind various SSO technologies (e. g. ) is that given deployment of these blood pressure > coversyl 2mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $133.00 from fda approved pharmacy technologies, will gradually have the option to maintain fewer credentials (aka personas) to wield with the sites/services we utilize. Thus our lives will be at least somewhat more simple and thus this interpretation for the "SSO" term. Blood pressure > coversyl 2mg pills (generic) > 90 pills > $133.00 from fda approved pharmacy qed, etc. So where does that leave the term represented by "SSO"? Personally, I subscribe to it's real-life meaning being:
"simplified sign-on"The perspective here being that (hopefully), given the emerging SSO-enabling technology (e. g. SAMLv2, , etc. ), it will begin to be deployed such that most all of us Netizens will have the opportunity to simplify our lists of site login credentials (I have > 80 last time I counted) and (hopefully) arrive at a more manageable number of credentials (aka personas) where n < 20 and hopefully for those who really want to, have n < 10. The foregoing quantities are just my personal off-the-cuff estimates, YMMV.